Irving

Irving v. Superior Court

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 141·79 Cal. App. 361·249 P. 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 1926Docket No. 3209.California990 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the respondent court directing the examination of certain witnesses to perpetuate their testimony. The following sections of the Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to the questions presented by this proceeding:

Petitioner contends that the application for the order does not state facts sufficient to give the court jurisdiction to make it. The application alleges:

The foregoing sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, providing for proceedings to perpetuate testimony, have never been construed by the higher courts of this state, but in San Francisco Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court, 155 Cal. 30, 35 [17 Ann. Cas. 933, 99 Pac. 359 ], it is said: “It was the intention of the legislature not only to provide a simple statutory proceeding by which litigants, actual or expectant, could secure all the relief formerly afforded by courts of equity, but even ampler relief, and upon easier terms. ” While it is doubtless true that, in a statutory proceeding to perpetuate testimony, the particularity of the former bills in equity for that purpose is not required, the nature of the anticipated controversy, the interest of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.