Elliott

Elliott v. Clark

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 227·5 Cal. App. 8·89 P. 455
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 1907Civ. No. 330.California1,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Ada M. Hudson, deceased, brought this action against Charlotte K. Clark, as special administratrix of the estate of George Hudson, deceased, to obtain a decree that certain real property, the legal title to which was in said George Hudson at the time of his death, was acquired and held by him in trust for Ada M. Hudson, and for her estate since her death, and for an accounting of the rents, issues and profits of said property. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer, and defendant now urges that the court erred in so doing, and we think this contention must be sustained.

The real point of the demurrer is that the complaint upon its face shows such laches on the part of plaintiff and his intestate as to bar any right of action upon the matters set forth as plaintiff’s cause of action. That this defense may be raised by general demurrer to the complaint where the laches is apparent upon the face of the complaint is well settled in this state. (Kleinclaus v. Dutard, 147 Cal. 245 , [ 81 Pac. 516 ]; Bell v. Hudson,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.