Herod

People v. Herod

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 246·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1224·295 P. 383
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1931Docket No. 4239.California1,114 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment foreclosing a certificate of purchase.

The record shows that on or about January 11, 1887, James Herod became the holder of a certificate of purchase for section 16, township 28 south, range 29 east, .M. D. B. & M. No payments were made as required, and on the twenty-third day of July, 1890, a complaint in foreclosure of the certificate of purchase was filed. On December 1, 1890, a decree of foreclosure was granted in said cause in favor of the plaintiff. On January 30, 1928, a little over thirty years after The judgment was entered, the appellant served a notice of motion to set aside the judgment on two grounds —First: That no service of summons, either personally or by publication, was ever made or had upon the defendant; and second: That no, legal service of summons, either personally or by publication, was ever, made or had upon the defendant.

The judgment-roll shows a complaint, the issuance of summons, order for publication of summons, and judgment by default, followed by decree of foreclosure. The judg- • ment or decree of foreclosure recites that the defendant had been regularly served with process,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.