Deangeles

Deangeles v. Cotta

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 395·62 Cal. App. 691·217 P. 821
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 1923Civ. No. 2630.California1,881 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This is an action of unlawful detainer brought to recover possession of certain lands on the alleged ground that the defendants had broken their covenant not to assign the lease under which they held. Defendants Luiz C. Amaro, Luiz Deniz, and George Silva failed to answer and default judgment was entered against them. The other defendants were given judgment and plaintiff has appealed.

The complaint alleges that “defendants” Joe D. Cotta, Luiz Deniz, Frank Deniz and Luiz C. Amaro, without the consent of first party in writing ... or without his consent in any other manner given, and without his knowledge, did assign all their right, title and interest in and to said lease and the premises therein described to George S. Silva and Frank M. Tosta, defendants above named, on or about the third day of January, 1921; that plaintiff had no knowledge of said assignment until a few days prior to the time of filing this complaint; that pursuant to said assignment the said George S. Silva and Frank M. Tosta went into the actual possession of said premises and ever since said third day of January, 1921, have been and now are in possession of said premises.” The complaint contains other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.