Schmitt
Schmitt v. Gripton
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Cashin, J.
An action to recover the earned premiums upon certain policies of fire insurance from the mortgagee of the insured property.
The court found, in accordance with the allegations of the complaint, that three policies of insurance were executed and delivered by respondent’s assignors, to California Lumber Products Company, a corporation, insuring property owned by the latter in Mendocino County against loss by fire; that at the special instance and request of appellant there was attached to each a clause providing that any loss within the terms of the policy should be payable to the mortgagee, and that it was further provided therein that should the corporation neglect to pay any premium on such policy the mortgagee would on demand pay the same; that the insured failed to pay; that demand was made therefor upon the mortgagee and, upon his refusal, the policies were canceled.
Upon the findings judgment for the aggregate amount of the earned premiums was entered against the mortgagee, and the appeal was taken by him therefrom.
The clause attached to each policy was the standard form of mortgage clause, the material portions of which are as follows: