Espinosa

Espinosa v. Gould

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 389·47 Cal. App. 316·190 P. 481
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 1920Civ. No. 3338.California625 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order refusing to change the place of trial. Plaintiff, theretofore adjudged to be an incompetent person, brought this action against his guardian and the other defendants, seeking to have the proceedings, whereby he was declared an incompetent, set aside as null and void, and praying for damages in the sum of twenty thousand dollars against defendants Manuel Espinosa and R. C. McComish.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, whereupon the plaintiff filed a motion for a change of place of trial, alleging in his affidavit accompanying the motion a belief that he could not have an impartial trial in the county wherein the action was brought by reason of the alleged bias and prejudice of the people of the community against him, and an alleged personal dislike on the part of the trial judge. The latter filed a counter-affidavit, in which he denied any prejudice or bias against the plaintiff, and alleged that he never had entertained and did not feel a personal dislike against him. The motion came on for hearing and was denied, the order of the court reciting, after the introductory portion, “Documentary evidence is introduced, said motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.