Fry

Fry v. Astorg

Good Law
29 Cal. App. 740·156 P. 873
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1916Civ. No. 1660.California877 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying the motion of the defendant the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company for a new trial.

Several years ago the plaintiff’s assignor, Y. A. Hager, commenced an action against A. Astorg, M. Astorg, and F. Ginard to recover possession of certain lands and premises situate in Lake County, in which action the plaintiff ultimately recovered a judgment against the defendants. Thereafter the defendant A. Astorg gave notice of appeal from the judgment, and filed the undertaking on which this action was brought, which by its language purports to be given in an appeal taken not by Astorg alone, but by all of the defendants in that action. It recites as follows:

“Whereas the defendants in the above entitled action have appealed to the Supreme Court . . . from a judgment made and entered against said defendants; . . .

“Now therefore, in consideration of the premises and of such appeal, the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company . . . does hereby undertake and promise on the part of the appellants that the said appellants will pay all costs and damages which may be awarded against them on the appeal. ...

“And whereas the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.