Lanz

Lanz v. First Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 587·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1243·9 P.2d 316
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1932Docket No. 4461.California6,361 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

This action was for declaratory relief and an injunction. Inasmuch as the claims of plaintiff, if established, could be fully settled by the payment of money, stipulations were entered into and approved, the effect of which was to obviate the necessity of injunctive relief.

The rights which plaintiff sought to have adjudicated involved the question of lien priority as between herself and the various defendants. The facts will develop as we proceed.

On and prior to July 15, 1923, Frank A. Powell was the owner of a certain lot or parcel of land in the county of Los Angeles, subject to certain liens. On or about that date, Powell and First Mortgage Corporation entered into a written agreement, which agreement is referred to throughout this controversy as the underwriting agreement. This agreement was in the form of a written offer by Powell and an acceptance by the First Mortgage Corporation.

The substance and effect of this agreement may here be noted. The Mortgage Corporation agrees to buy, at a ten per cent discount, $900,000 first mortgage bonds maturing at the rate of $4,000 per month for 107 months and the balance in ten years from date. These bonds are to be secured by deed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.