Frederick

Frederick v. Landfield

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 358·78 Cal. App. 724·248 P. 679
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 1926Docket No. 5133.California1,176 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

This action was one brought by plaintiffs to recover the sum of $1,875 against defendant, a stock and bond broker, for services rendered in procuring a purchaser for 150 shares of the capital stock of the Golden Gate Ferry Company, a common carrier. Defendant Landfield was the fiscal agent of the company in the sale of an issue of its capital stock and plaintiffs were employed by him as salesmen for the sale of these and other securities. As compensation for their services in selling the stock defendant Landfield agreed to pay plaintiffs 12% per cent of the selling price of $100 a share. Under his agreement with the company Landfield was authorized to accept 25 per cent of the amount of each subscription, the balance to be paid at the office of the company. From this 25 per cent Landfield was entitled to deduct his full commission. Under their employment with Landfield plaintiffs were instructed as to the terms upon which sales could and would be made and with this understanding they entered upon their duties as salesmen. In the month of October, 1921, and prior to the transaction in question, plaintiff Frederick, as broker in the employ of Landfield, had sold to one E. M. Horn of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.