Wing

People v. Wing

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 186·23 Cal. App. 53·137 P. 48
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1913Crim. No. 437.California674 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary, the sentence to run concurrently with a previous sentence for a similar crime. This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant makes the point that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.

Very briefly the evidence introduced by the people shows that a room of the prosecuting witness was burglarized on the 7th day of September, 1912, and from it there were taken wearing apparel, jewelry, a razor and a pawn ticket for a diamond ring. Notwithstanding that the defendant and a friend of his called Kelly occupied rooms in another building in San Francisco (the crime being committed in that city), the defendant just prior to the seventh day of September rented a room in the Hotel Belvedere adjoining the room of the prosecuting witness; and in the morning of the burglary, at about 11 o’clock, the defendant and associates of his were seen near the room of said witness, and at about that time one of the defendant’s callers was noticed leaving the building with a large bundle,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.