Heide
Wright & Hogan, Inc. v. Heide
Opinion
Lead Opinion
York, J.
Appeal from a judgment quieting title in plaintiff and for costs.
The only matter to be considered is whether or not an examination of the record discloses .sufficient facts to substantiate all of the material findings of the court. An investigation does disclose, contrary to appellant’s statement, sufficient evidence to support all of the findings.
The facts found bring the case within the provisions of section 1624, subdivisions 5 and 6, of the Civil Code, and section 1973, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The only claim of the defendant to the property was his claim of a right to purchase under an alleged contract of sale and purchase in which respondent is mentioned as the owner, and which contract was signed with the name of the plaintiff, by H. H. Steiner, and there is no evidence whatever in this record to show that Steiner was ever au thorized in writing to make any sales contract on behalf of plaintiff.
The evidence as to the agency of LeRoy and Steiner being sufficient to justify the trial court in finding that they were the agents to find purchasers only for the property in question and other properties, and there being sufficient evidence to .show that…