Short

Short v. Short

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 210·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 547·288 P. 1111
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 1930Docket No. 7163.California1,682 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to recover under two separate contracts. The defendant answered and a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. That court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

Formerly the plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. They had a child, a son, who was about ten years of age when this case was tried. During their married life the parties accumulated some community property. In January, 1927, they entered into an agreement which the parties termed the first agreement. By its terms the plaintiff agreed to sell to the defendant for the sum of $50,000 all of her rights in the community property; she also agreed that he might have the custody of their minor son and it was further agreed that she would go to Paris, obtain a divorce and marry James Bond. That agreement was partly executed. Mrs. Short conveyed her interests in the community property and the defendant has ever since retained the same. They could not borrow $50,000 on their properties, but they succeeded in borrowing $35,000, which in the form of a check Mr. Short delivered to James Bond, who invested the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.