Waybright

Waybright v. Meek

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 98·90 Cal. App. 13·265 P. 370
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1928Docket No. 6272.California1,152 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Action to recover a broker’s commission of $5,000 for securing a loan of $50,000. The complaint is in three counts. The first cause of action alleges an agreement to pay plaintiff and Elmer E. Cole $5,000 to negotiate the loan. The second alleges that plaintiff performed services as -broker for defendants to the reasonable value of $5,000. The third, that, plaintiff performed services as broker for defendants and that they agreed to pay for said services the sum of $5,000. Prior to the filing of the action, Cole assigned his interest in the claim to plaintiff. Issues were joined on an answer which denied all of the allegations of the complaint and on a counterclaim of $103. Trial was had without a jury. The trial court found that about April 25, 1922, defendant Meek entered into an agreement with plaintiff and his associate Cole, whereby they were employed to negotiate a loan of $50,000 and that Meek agreed to pay the sum of $5,000 for their services. The court further found that about said day defendant Meek signed a written memorandum of agreement wherein he agreed to pay plaintiff and his associate the said sum for services performed hy them for him on and prior to April 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.