Lowenthal

Williams v. Lowenthal

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 179·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 805·12 P.2d 75
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 1932Docket No. 727.California3,392 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover the balance alleged to be due from defendant on account of the sale by plaintiff's assignor to defendant of a musical instrument known as an orchestrope. Defendant was the proprietor of a restaurant in the city of Fresno. The orehestrope was an electrically operated phonograph equipped with fifty-six phonograph records. It was so arranged that it would operate upon the deposit of five-cent coins in a receptacle provided for them. The instrument was sold under a conditional sales contract whereby defendant agreed to pay therefor the sum of $1438, of which $100 was paid at. the time the written agreement was executed and the balance was to be paid at the rate of $55.77 per month. The sales contract provided that until the total purchase price was paid, title should remain in the seller. In case of default in the payment of any monthly installment due from the buyer the entire purchase price was to become immediately due and payable. It was further provided that no warranty or guaranty was given unless specified in the written agreement, which was declared to constitute the entire contract between the parties. Plaintiff’s complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.