Lepper

Lepper v. Ratterree

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 577·98 Cal. App. 245·276 P. 1037
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 1929Docket Nos. 3749, 3750.California4,542 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The above cases relate to the entering into contracts for the purchase of two lots situate in Ratterree’s Washington Boulevard Tract Number 6256, city of Los Angeles. The cases were consolidated for trial, were tried upon the same testimony, and are presented to us for consideration upon one transcript. The facts relating to each case are identical. The defendant filed a cross-complaint in both actions, and in both actions had judgment. The plaintiffs in each ease appeal.

The record shows that on and prior to October 15, 1923, the defendant was and had been engaged in the business of selling lots in different parts of Los Angeles County, and for that purpose had agents and salesmen engaged in interesting and finding prospective purchasers for such lots; that on or about said date the plaintiff Emily Lepper and the plaintiff Lera Clark went upon the said Ratterree Tract and viewed two lots which the plaintiffs testified were lots 235 and 236 of said tract. The premises were a part of what is known as Washington Boulevard Tract, lying along and on the north side of Washington Boulevard in the city of Los Angeles. That the said plaintiffs, at the time of viewing the lots in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.