Clarkson

Clarkson v. Moir

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 439·53 Cal. App. 775·201 P. 474
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 1921Civ. No. 3685.California2,825 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Separate actions were brought against appellants and judgments rendered against each of them, from which judgments they have appealed. In accordance with stipulations of the parties, the appeals are. presented on one hill of exceptions and record. Each of the defendants was held liable to pay to the plaintiff, as liquidator of the Sovereign Bank of Canada, an amount equal to the par value of the shares held by her in that bank, a corporation which became insolvent. The recovery was based upon the insolvency of the corporation and resulting proceedings and judgment of the supreme court of Ontario, in the Dominion of Canada, as set forth in the amended complaint. The proceedings in the supreme court of Ontario were conducted under the “Winding-Up Act,” and amendment thereto, of the' Dominion of Canada. In the judgment rendered in those proceedings, each of the defendants was designated as contributory, and settled upon the list of contributories for a stated amount, and a call was thereby made for the full amount for which the contributory named was settled upon the list of contributories.

The present actions were commenced on the twenty-sixth day of January, 1916: The answers of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.