Zellerbach

Bayside Fish Flour Co. v. Zellerbach

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 707·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 591·293 P. 834
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 1930Docket No. 7616.California1,083 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate directing the defendant board to issue to the petitioner a revocable permit to take and use ten thousand tons of sardines to manufacture an edible fish flour. The petitioner alleges that it is a corporation having its principal place of business in San Francisco; that it owns and operates a “ ... manufacturing plant located in the city and county of Monterey, State of California . . . ”; that it has been operating continuously since the year 1924 under and by virtue of a permit issued by respondents on the twenty-second day of August, 1925; and pleads in haec verba said permit; that on the eighth day of July, 1929,.the petitioner applied for a revocable permit, and pleads in haec verba said application; that a hearing on said application was had on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1929; that on the fifth day of August, 1929, the defendant board entered in its minutes an order directing the issuance of a revocable permit for the season of 1928-29; that on the fifteenth day of August, 1929, the defendant board caused a letter to be sent to the petitioner advising the petitioner of its action and authorizing petitioner to proceed until the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.