Glas

Barrett-Hicks Co. v. Glas

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 98·9 Cal. App. 491·99 P. 856
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1908Civ. No. 475.California3,349 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Foreclosure of mechanics ’ and material-men’s liens. The detailed facts will be found stated in the consolidated action under this title in 97 Pac. 423 and 99 Pac. 857 . Certain of the causes of action were first disposed of in this court which were later taken to the supreme court by transfer, where the conclusions of this court were concurred in. The present appeal, which is on a separate transcript, was taken by plaintiff: First, from that part of the judgment entered in the first cause of action set out in the complaint, adjudging that plaintiffs are not entitled to the lien claimed, to wit, for certain building materials furnished defendants Glas through their agent, Sircy, amounting in value to $89.10, with interest thereon at seven per cent per annum, from May 11, 1904; and, second, from that part of the judgment, to like effect, entered in the second cause of action, to wit, for 'certain work and materials furnished by one Madary, amounting to the sum of $387.24, with interest at seven per cent from May 11, 1904, which said claim and lien were duly assigned to plaintiffs.

1. As to the first of these causes of action the nineteenth finding of the court is as follows: “The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.