Rogaff

Rogaff v. Bartles

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 429·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 596·1 P.2d 517
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 1931Docket No. 6585.California1,450 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Houser, J.

On terms and conditions set forth in a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant, it was agreed that plaintiff would buy from defendant and defendant would sell to plaintiff a certain lot or parcel of land. Among the conditions which were stated in the contract were “Lot is B Zone. No setback, no fill, and no restrictions against building a four-story apartment house.” In connection with such transaction, following the delivery to plaintiff of a deed of the property and the commencement by him of the construction of a four-story apartment house thereon, in the course of the excavation for the foundation for said building it was discovered that the lot had been filled; which fact induced the outlay by plaintiff of a considerable sum of money in payment of labor and materials for the increased depth of excavation for foundation, brick and cement walls, etc. Thereafter, “relying upon the terms and conditions of the aforesaid agreement”, plaintiff brought an action for damages against defendant. Preliminary to the rendition of a judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which defendant appeals to this, court, in substance the trial court made its finding of fact that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.