Nonnenmann

Liberty Bank v. Nonnenmann

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 42·96 Cal. App. 478·274 P. 568
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1929Docket No. 6526.California3,188 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is an action upon two promissory notes in the principal sum of $2,500 each executed by the defendant Elwood Nonnenmann and by his father Charles L. Nonnenmann, since deceased, as makers in favor of the California Bank of San Mateo County, as payee, and transferred after maturity to the plaintiff Liberty Bank. The defendants Elwood Nonnenmann and Emma Adelaide Nonnenmann, as administratrix of the estate of Charles L. Nonnenmann, deceased, filed answers in which they denied the execution of the notes and that there was anything due thereon; that plaintiff acquired the notes after maturity and is not a holder in due course; that the notes were executed without consideration and were not delivered to the payee, and the proceeds thereof were not deposited to the credit of the makers nor paid to them, and a special defense of fraud, which is in the main as follows: that for many years prior to September 1, 1923, the Nonnenmanns, father and son, were intimately acquainted with and reposed confidence in one Ray Falvey; that Falvey was on that date assistant cashier of the Peninsula Bank in Burlingame, where all of the parties resided; that on or about September 1, 1923, Falvey…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.