Benning

Benning v. Superior Court

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 93·34 Cal. App. 296·167 P. 291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 1917Civ. No. 1692.California2,085 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

This is a petition for writ of mandate to compel the superior court in and for the county of Sacramento and the judge thereof to set aside an order settling the final account of the administrator and decree of distribution in the matter of the estate of Manuel S. Nevis, deceased.

Petitioner is the assignee of Charles Peterson, a creditor of said estate. Peterson duly presented his claim, which was allowed by the administrator and the judge of the superior court for $992. Thereafter the administrator paid petitioner $607.61, leaving a balance of $331.13. Thereafter, and upon the fifteenth day of October, 1913, the administrator filed a final account of the administration of said estate, accompanied by a report and petition for distribution, wherein it was alleged, among other things, that all the “debts of said deceased, expenses of administration, etc., have been fully paid,” and that said estate was ready for distribution. After notices had been duly posted as required by law, stating that said account was for final settlement, a hearing was had, and upon evidence being taken in support of the allegations of said report and petition, an order was made settling said account as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.