Maguire

Maguire v. Long-Hurst

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 841·82 Cal. App. 548·255 P. 875
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 1927Docket No. 3219.California1,479 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Finch, J.

— The complaint alleges that the plaintiff purchased from the defendant a Flint sport roadster for $2,245 and delivered to defendant in payment therefor a Flint touring car and the plaintiff’s promissory note for $945; that “defendant agreed to give plaintiff a credit upon the purchase price of said Flint sport roadster of $1,300 on account of said Flint touring car, and defendant further agreed that in the event he, defendant, was able to dispose of said Flint touring car for $1,300 he, the defendant, would pay to plaintiff the sum of $500 out of the proceeds of said sale, less $100 to be retained by the defendant for possible service charges which might accrue upon the Flint sport roadster above mentioned; and the defendant further agreed that in no event would he sell the said Flint touring car for less than $1,100, in which event he, defendant, would pay to plaintiff the sum of $300, less $100 for possible service charges as above set forth”; that the defendant sold the touring car for $1,300 and that he performed no services on the roadster; and that the plaintiff had fully paid the amount due upon his promissory note. The prayer is for judgment in the sum of $500.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.