Burns

Newhall Land Farming Co. v. Burns

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 411·31 Cal. App. 549·161 P. 14
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1916Civ. No. 1990.California2,035 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Defendants prosecute this appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff quieting its title to certain lands described in the complaint, and likewise appeal from an order of court denying their motion for a new trial of said action.

Defendants base their claim to an interest in the lands upon two contracts alleged to have been executed by plaintiff, the first of which was dated January 31, 1912, whereby plaintiff, for a consideration of seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars, to be paid as therein stipulated, agreed to sell and defendant Burns and one R. E. Muncy agreed to purchase the property in question. At the time of the making of this contract there was paid to the plaintiff the sum of five thousand dollars, and the agreement was placed in escrow with the Citizens’ National Bank of Los Angeles, “to be delivered only in the event of the payment of the sum of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) on or before May 1st,-1912.” Burns and Muncy failed to pay this forty-five thousand dollars, and on April 29, 1912, they, with plaintiff, executed an agreement reciting the fact that the contract was not to be delivered except upon the payment of forty-five thousand dollars…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.