Rosenshine

Pacific States Corp. v. Rosenshine

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 266·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 928·298 P. 155
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 1931Docket No. 7393.California3,867 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Houser, J.

The appeal herein is presented to this court from a judgment of dismissal of an action which, as to one cause of action set forth in the amended complaint therein, resulted from an order made by the trial court by which a demurrer interposed by defendants was sustained without leave to amend said cause of action; and as to each of two other alleged separate causes of action stated in said complaint, followed the failure of the plaintiff to amend the same after said demurrer thereto had been sustained by order of the trial court, with leave granted to the plaintiff to amend said cause of action within a time also fixed by said order. Since as to each cause of action attempted to be pleaded in the complaint a question of law arises which differs from that or those involved in either of the other causes of action in said complaint, it becomes necessary to consider separately herein the demurrer of defendants as separately applied to the respective causes of action.

In general, the entire action was founded upon the alleged repudiation of a lease of certain premises entered into between the plaintiff and the Pan-American. Bank of California for a period of twenty-five years at a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.