Fetterley

Fetterley v. Randall

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 917·92 Cal. App. 411·268 P. 434
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 1928Docket No. 5156.California2,099 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

The parties to this cause are Oliver Fetterley, plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent; Helen M. Randall, defendant, cross-defendant and appellant, and First Savings Bank of Vallejo, California, defendant and cross-complainant. On the 13'th of March, 1922, and after a proceeding authorized by sections 2168, 2169 and 2170 of the Political Code, viz., a hearing before a superior judge with two physicians present, sometimes referred to as the lunacy commission, respondent was ordered committed to the state hospital for the insane. Before his trial thereon before a court and jury, which he had demanded, respondent made and delivered to appellant a bank draft upon the First Savings Bank of Vallejo, California, for the sum of $500, payment as attorney's fee to appellant. Respondent had contracted for the services of appellant long before the institution of the proceedings above mentioned. This draft appellant cashed. Respondent demands the return of this sum, on the ground that he was legally incapacitated to enter into a contract at the time he employed appellant. Appellant contends that respondent was legally competent to make the contract and to draw the check or draft, and also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.