MacKnight
MacKnight v. Davitt
Opinion
lead Opinion
In this action to recover a commission claimed to have been earned for securing the acceptance of an offer to exchange real property, the trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff, from which judgment defendant appeals.
On the twenty-seventh day of February, 1917, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement in which defendant represented himself as the owner of certain property on Eddy Street, in San Francisco, and appointed plaintiff his agent to act in negotiating an exchange of that property for certain other property on Oak Street, both properties being described in the agreement, and defendant agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of $375 as commission when he secured an acceptance of the proposition to exchange the said property. The trial court found that plaintiff had secured an acceptance in accordance with the terms of the contract and that defendant had failed to perform his part of the agreement, and accordingly gave judgment for the plaintiff.
It is contended that the trial court erred in permitting the plaintiff to remedy by oral testimony a defective description of the property in the contract. In a contract to employ a broker to sell or exchange real…