Johnson v. De Waard

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 417·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 905·298 P. 92
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1931Docket No. 7662.California1,822 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ward, J.

Defendants de Waard & Sons, bonded by the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, contracted with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District to construct the Altadena storm drain. A part of this improvement consisted in excavating and concreting a tunnel, together with some work to be performed upon a drift or incline.

De Waard & Sons entered into an oral agreement, which was subsequently reduced to writing, whereby they subcontracted to the plaintiffs the excavating work at $8 per lineal foot, and the timbering at $5 per 1,000 b. m. feet of lumber put in place for timbering the tunnel. The written contract provided that de Waard & Sons should supply air compressor, pipe-line, track, cars, lumber, water, lights, tools, powder, fuse and caps free of charge at the power house or at the heading outside the tunnel. The equipment was to be returned in good condition, except for usual wear and tear. Payments were to be made as follows: Ninety per cent when received by de Waard & Sons from the Los An geles County Flood Control District and the balance upon completion and acceptance of the work.

Plaintiffs based their claim upon the original oral contract. Defendants presented a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.