Gillstarr

People v. Gillstarr

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 267·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 400·22 P.2d 549
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1933Docket No. 2371.California414 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Henderson, J.

The defendant Jeff Reed and one Thomas Gillstarr were charged by an information containing two counts with the crime of robbery. The jury before whom the defendants were tried returned verdicts finding each of them guilty of robbery in the first degree. The defendant Reed appeals from the judgment. The evidence at the trial proved that defendant Gillstarr was armed with a deadly weapon, which was, however, the property of appellant Reed, and both defendants took part in the robbery.

Appellant, by reason of the fact that the evidence did not prove that he had any deadly weapon in his own possession, contends that the court erred in denying him permission to make application for probation for the reason, as stated by the trial judge, that he did not have jurisdiction to grant probation. From the facts before us, however, we must conclude that defendant’s motion was finally summarily denied pursuant to section 1203 of the Penal Code. While it is, in general terms, the right of a defendant under this section to apply to the court for leave to file an application for -probation, the granting or the refusing of the motion is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.