Edgar

Edgar v. Citraro

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 183·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 997·297 P. 653
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1931Docket No. 7069.California900 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rose Edgar, one of the plaintiffs above named, and her minor daughter, Florence, were riding in an automobile driven by the defendant Citraro and were injured when • it collided with one driven by the defendant Pratt at the intersection of Fifth and Julian Streets in San Jose. The other occupants of the Citraro car were Mrs. Edgar’s minor son John, and her sister Mrs. Traylen, who were also injured. Several actions for damages grew out of the collision. Two were filed by the plaintiffs herein. In one of them they sought to be indemnified for the financial loss they suffered by reason of injuries to their daughter Florence, and in the other (the present one) they asked for damages on account of the personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Edgar. The former action was consolidated for trial with one brought by the boy John in his own behalf, and a jury awarded Edgar and his wife a verdict. Judgment being entered accordingly, the defendants took separate appeals, and the judgment has this day been affirmed as to both defendants (John F. Edgar et ux. v. Citraro et al. (No. 6905 and No. 7070), ante, p. 178, post, p. 762 [ 297 Pac. 652 , 654]). Following the trial of that action the present…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.