Beyerle

Beyerle v. Clift

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 120·59 Cal. App. 7·209 P. 1015
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1922Civ. No. 3915.California1,604 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Action to recover damages for injuries to a truck owned by the plaintiff, such injuries being caused, so it is alleged, by negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile driven by him, by reason whereof it became necessary for the operator of plaintiff’s truck to drive the truck entirely off the highway, in order to avoid a collision with the defendant’s automobile. As a result of its being so driven off the highway into soft ground, the truck turned over and was thereby damaged to the extent described in the complaint. The defendant, in addition to denying the alleged acts of negligence on his part, alleged that the plaintiff “was guilty of negligence in the manner in which he operated his automobile truck at the time and place of the accident, in that he did not exercise ordinary care or any care in the operation of said truck, all of which directly and proximately contributed to the accident in question.” Pursuant to the verdict of a jury, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals therefrom.

The errors relied upon consist in the giving of two instructions to the jury. In each of these instructions the court stated certain provisions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.