Smallpage

Electric Utilities Co. v. Smallpage

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 640·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 934·31 P.2d 412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1934Docket No. 5081.California798 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

The defendants have moved to dismiss the appeal which was taken from a judgment rendered and entered against the plaintiff for failure to° amend his third amended complaint within the time allowed after a demurrer thereto had been sustained. The motion to dismiss the appeal is made pursuant to rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, for failure on the part of the appellant to file his points and authorities as required, and on the further ground that the appeal was taken merely for delay and presents questions only of unsubstantial merit.

It appears from the complaint that Charles A. Menne was doing business under the fictitious name of Electric Utilities Company. The third amended complaint was filed in the name of Electric Utilities Company. It also appears from the complaint that the plaintiff had been declared a bankrupt prior to the commencement of this action, and that a trustee of his estate had been appointed and qualified. To this third amended complaint the defendants filed a demurrer under the provisions of section 430 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon the ground, among numerous other grounds which were stated, that there is a defect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.