Bernardo

Bernardo v. Soderman

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 161·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 69·124 P. 866
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 1912Civ. No. 984.California1,150 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action wherein the plaintiffs sought to recover the sum of $835.50, claimed and admitted to have heen paid to the defendant by the plaintiffs as the purchasers of certain real property pursuant to the terms of an installment contract. The case was tried by the lower court and submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts, which, by stipulation of the parties, constitute the trial court’s findings of fact. It was also stipulated in the court below by the parties to the action that judgment might be rendered, in accordance with the law, upon the agreed statement and findings of fact as if a trial upon the issues purporting to have been raised by the pleadings had been had in" the usual and ordinary way. Whereupon judgment was rendered and entered that plaintiffs take nothing by their action, and that defendant have and recover his costs from the plaintiffs.

By the terms of the contract in controversy it was mutually agreed that the defendant would sell to the plaintiffs and that plaintiffs would purchase from the defendants certain real property situated in the county of Alameda for the sum of $2,400. The contract recited that time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.