Hale

Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 729·42 Cal. App. 55·183 P. 280
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 1919Civ. No. 2852.California1,691 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff upon which judgment was entered and from which defendant has appealed upon the judgment-roll accompanied by a bill of exceptions.

The facts out of which the accident grew and concerning which there is little controversy in the evidence are as follows: At the time when plaintiff sustained the injury, defendant was engaged in constructing and operating a telephone system in the city of San Diego. For its use as a storeroom for supplies and material required in its construction work, it occupied an uninclosed cottage in the rear of which was a lattice porch with an open space of some four or five feet for entry. Upon this porch was a shelf platform two and one-half to three feet above the floor, and on Saturday, the day preceding the accident, defendant’s employees placed upon this shelf a wooden box wherein, underneath some excelsior packing, was deposited a tin box containing dynamite caps of a high explosive character and dangerous to persons unacquainted with the care and handling thereof. The top of this wooden box was covered by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.