Shelley

Shelley v. Hart

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 231·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 40·297 P. 82
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1931Docket No. 4163.California2,993 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for the breach of a contract for the purchase of an automobile truck, and from an order taxing costs.

The plaintiff held a contract to deliver sixty tons of clay to the Lincoln pottery. He was engaged in hauling this material from a pit at White Rock, a distance of thirty-three miles by means of a Fageol truck. He desired a larger truck which could make greater speed. He purchased an International truck from the defendant for $7,600. He paid $2,500 on the purchase price at the time of the execution of the contract. He was also credited with a further sum of $2,600, the agreed value of a Mack truck which he traded to the defendant on the bargain. The balance of the purchase price was to be subsequently paid.

The chief controversy involves the question as to whether certain printed portions of a form of contract became part of the agreement to purchase the truck. The purchase was consummated at the defendant’s place of business. The plaintiff was handed a ■ copy of the usual form of contract. Most of the blank spaces on the upper half of the front page of this form were filled in by the defendant in typewriting. The spaces regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.