Los Angeles Printing Co. v. Los Angeles Round-Up

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 733·282 P. 401
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1929Docket No. 7096.California555 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Koford, J.

Several parties plaintiff filed attachment suits against defendants and levied attachments. Various labor claimants came forward, claiming a preference upon the property and funds attached. Thereafter a judgment was entered pursuant to stipulation. The stipulation was signed by the attorneys for the several parties plaintiff and by the attorneys for the defendants and also by a firm of attorneys who the stipulation said represented at that time all of the labor claimants who had filed claims with the sheriff pursuant to sections 1206 and 1207 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The stipulation provided that judgment might be entered for the plaintiffs as prayed in their several complaints and that upon execution being issued the sheriff would pay out of the moneys in his hands $2,791.14 as full satisfaction of all labor claims, and that the balance should he applied in satisfaction of the plaintiffs’ judgments. A judgment was made by the court upon reading and filing this stipulation on the fifteenth day of April, 1926.

Thereafter the appellant herein, George H. Ganaway, a labor claimant, gave notice of a motion to vacate said judgment. The said motion was apparently denied by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.