Mulford

National Bank of California v. Mulford

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 551·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 33·120 P. 446
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 1911Civ. No. 994.California1,534 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action to foreclose two mortgages. The facts, so far as necessary to the decision of the case, are as follows: For the purpose of securing the payment of his two promissory notes, the defendant W. L. Mulford executed to his codefendants Boggs and Noyes two mortgages, one upon chattels, the other upon certain real estate, after which he transferred all interest in the real estate mortgaged to defendant Los Angeles Paving Brick Company, appellant herein. Boggs and Noyes transferred the mortgages and notes to plaintiff, who, upon default in the payment thereof, instituted this action, joining W. L. Mulford, the Los Angeles Paving Brick Company, F. A. Noyes and A. W. Boggs as parties defendant, and against each of whom plaintiff asked that a deficiency judgment be docketed in case the proceeds of the sale of the property mortgaged were found insufficient to pay the amount due.

The court made its findings and, in accordance therewith, rendered judgment for plaintiff, decreeing, first, the sale of the chattels, and if the proceeds thereof were inadequate to pay the judgment, then the sale of the real property mortgaged, and directing that if the proceeds thereof were found insufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.