Helmlinger

People v. Helmlinger

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 143·69 Cal. App. 139·230 P. 675
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 1924Crim. No. 1089.California1,126 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses. The specific charge against the defendant was that he obtained the sum of $200 from the complaining witness T. S-. Miller for a one-half interest in a certain real estate business which defendant represented he was then carrying on at 311 San Fernando building in the city of Los Angeles. The false and fraudulent representations, which it is alleged defendant made to the said Miller and which induced the latter to pay defendant said $200 for a half interest in said real estate business, were that said real estate business w:as then yield ing a net profit of from $800 to $l,000i per month; that defendant had sold, for one Benjamin F. Porter, at a price of $850 per acre, two tracts of land, one of twelve acres and the other of twenty-five acres, and that said defendant had listed with him for sale, by the owners thereof, a number of pieces of real property located in the city of Los Angeles.

Practically the only question involved in this appeal is whether there is sufficient corroborative evidence in the record to comply with the requirements of section 1110 of the Penal Code. The complaining witness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.