Arendt

Arendt v. McConnell

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 354·41 Cal. App. 511·183 P. 202
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1919Civ. No. 2740.California1,074 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haven, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree annulling an agreement of exchange between plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff and one Edward A. Lesser were the owners in common of a certain tract of land in the county of Tulare. They jointly agreed with the defendant McConnell to exchange the above referred to tract of land for 3,250 shares each of the preferred and common capital stock of the Consolidated Concessions Company, and certain other considerations hereinafter referred to. The agreement was consummated by the execution and delivery to McConnell of a deed of the real property and the. delivery by McConnell to the plaintiff and Lessef o.f certificates for the required number of shares of the capital stock of the corporation referred to. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the defendant made certain false representations to him with regard to the value of said stock and the assets and indebtedness of the corporation which had issued such stock; that plaintiff believed said statements were true, and relied upon them, and by reason thereof was induced to enter into the agreement of exchange; that he later discovered that the assets and affairs of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.