Edgar

Edgar v. Citraro

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 178·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 998·297 P. 654
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1931Docket No. 7070.California1,817 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Plaintiffs, as the parents of Florence Edgar, a minor, brought this action to recover the damages they claimed to have sustained by reason of the injuries their daughter received in a collision between two automobiles driven respectively by the defendants Citraro and Pratt, which occurred at Fifth and Julian Streets in San Jose. The action was consolidated for trial with one brought by John Edgar, a minor, against the same parties and arising out of the same collision, and upon trial before a jury the plaintiffs herein were awarded a verdict against both defendants. The result of the ease brought by John Edgar, a minor, does not appear from the record. From the judgment entered in favor of these plaintiffs the defendants have taken separate appeals.

At the time of the collision Florence Edgar was one of several occupants of the Citraro machine. The others were her mother, Mrs. Rose Edgar, her aunt, Mrs. Frances P. Traylen, and her brother John, all of whom, including Florence, brought actions for damages. The actions instituted by Florence Edgar and Mrs. Traylen were tried separately and resulted in verdicts in their favor and against both defendants; and separate appeals were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.