O'Donnell

People v. O'Donnell

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 716·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 248·117 P. 933
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 1911Crim. No. 151.California536 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

This case may be disposed of with scant comment. The appellant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, and in the recital of the evidence we may follow substantially the opening statement to the jury made by Mr. Schillig, the district attorney of Sutter county: On the nineteenth day of September, 1910, the residence of one Henry Van Tiger of Yuba City was entered and burglarized. The defendant had been employed on the premises in an almond orchard for ten days or two weeks, and he was familiar with the surroundings and knew that the members of the Van Tiger family were engaged in hulling almonds in the orchard and back of the barn. He quit his employment and was paid off on Saturday evening, the 17th of September, and on the afternoon of the. 19th he was seen going toward the Van Tiger residence only a short distance away; about a half hour later he was seen returning. The same afternoon he went into a saloon in Marysville and left with the proprietor some articles, including an ordinary door key, and also exhibited to the latter a gold dollar. Such key and a gold dollar were a part of the property taken from said residence. After his arrest the appellant declared that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.