Wilson

Wilson v. Earp

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 964·91 Cal. App. 538·267 P. 112
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 1928Docket No. 5134.California1,051 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hazlett, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover commissions she alleged she earned in procuring purchasers . for defendant of office spaces in a building to be erected. Judgment was given for defendant.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and her appeal is made pursuant to the alternative method provided for in sections 953a, 953b, and 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure. However, she did not print in her briefs or in a supplement thereto sufficient of the record to indicate that the trial court committed any error in giving judgment for defendant. The only portions of the record so printed are one paragraph of plaintiff’s amended complaint, the paragraph of defendant’s answer thereto, and the findings made by the court consisting of one paragraph. The paragraph from the amended complaint recites that plaintiff and defendant made a contract whereby plaintiff was employed by defendant to interview prospective purchasers of office spaces in a building to be erected, to advertise the proposed building and to otherwise interest various persons therein, as defendant should direct, and to induce such prospective purchasers to interview defendant, and that defendant should pay to plaintiff five per cent of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.