North

North v. Evans

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 434·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1019·28 P.2d 938
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1934Docket No. 1098.California682 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal. On October 9, 1933, respondent gave notice that on November 13, 1933, a motion to dismiss the appeal would be presented. The grounds for the motion were stated to be, first, failure of appellant to file points and authorities within the time prescribed by the rules of this court and, second, failure of appellant to cause a bill of exceptions to be prepared and settled. On October 31, 1933, appellant filed her opening brief. The regular calendar day of this court for the month of November, 1933, was Tuesday, November 14th, and respondent not having noticed the motion for hearing on said date it was not placed on the calendar which was heard on November 14, 1933. On November 22, 1933, respondent gave notice that on December 12, 1933, a supplemental motion to dismiss the appeal would be presented. The notice stated that the motion for dismissal of the appeal would be based upon the grounds set forth in the motion which was filed in October and upon the grounds set out in the supplemental motion filed on November 22, 1933. The additional grounds stated in the supplemental motion are that appellant’s opening brief shows on its face that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.