Pierce

Pierce v. Hill

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 742·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 138·7 P.2d 201
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 1932Docket No. 6756.California1,071 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Houser, J.

This appeal is taken from an order or judgment entered in favor of the petitioners for a peremptory writ of mandate directed to the appellants herein by which each of them, as the president and the secretary, respectively, of the California & Eastern Steamship Company, a corporation, was directed to permit said petitioners as stockholders therein to inspect and examine the corporate records of said corporation.

As in force at the date of the judgment, such a right in a bona fide stockholder of a corporation was secured to him by the provisions of section 377 of the Civil Code. However, said statute also contained the limitation upon such right that “the board of directors may, by unanimous vote, deny such examination or inspection to a stockholder who demands the same with intent to use to the injury of the corporation the information to be acquired thereby, ... ”.

Prom the record herein it appears that, based upon its conclusion that the examination and inspection of the records of the corporation was sought by the stockholders “with intent to use to the injury of the corporation”,— by the unanimous vote of the “executive committee” of the board of directors, the request of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.