Howland

Howland v. Leonard

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 222·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 223·16 P.2d 1031
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1932Docket No. 998.California1,178 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

Plaintiff originally instituted this action against the defendants Ida Leonard, John Doe Leonard, her husband, and Charles Leonard, to rescind, on the ground of fraud, a certain contract entered into between him and defendants Ida Leonard and Charles Leonard. The contract whose rescission was sought was one whereby plaintiff had agreed to exchange an interest in a confectionery store which he owned in the city of Los Angeles for the lease, equipment and furnishings of a motion picture theater in the same city owned by said defendants. As consideration for the transfer to him of the theater and its equipment, plaintiff, in addition to turning over to said defendants his interest in the confectionery establishment, also executed his promissory note for $2,700 in favor of defendant Ida Leonard and as security for its payment executed in her favor a mortgage upon certain real property owned by him. In the original complaint for rescission of the agreement of exchange it was alleged that the defendants had not transferred the note and mortgage and as part of the relief demanded, return of these instruments was sought. It appears, however, that at some time subsequent to the filing of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.