Abbott

City of Los Angeles v. Abbott

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 144·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 997·18 P.2d 785
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1933Docket No. 7354.California2,784 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Craig, J.

In an action in eminent domain instituted by the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, wherein the respondent was, among others, named as a defendant, all proceedings and expenditures of moneys were subsequently enjoined by the decree of a co-ordinate court in another suit. Respondent thereafter moved to dismiss this action as though the same had been abandoned, within the purview of sections 1255 and 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Said motion was granted, and he thereupon filed a “memorandum of costs and disbursements”, which included an item entitled “attorneys’ fees $1,650.00”. There was then filed on behalf of appellant a notice of motion to tax costs, particularly excepting to said item, together with an affidavit setting forth the facts above recited, and that all proceedings in the condemnation matter had been held null and void and that appellant, its officers, agents and employees were restrained from approving any demand for costs or expenses incurred, or paying out any moneys in connection with said contemplated improvement. The motion to tax costs was denied, and the plaintiff appealed from the order made and entered accordingly.

It is conceded that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.