Webber
People v. Webber
Opinion
lead Opinion
Conrey, J.
The defendant was brought to trial on three indictments, the eases being consolidated and tried together. Indictment No. 1726 contained three counts. The first count charged that the defendant offered and procured a certain false and forged instrument to be recorded in the office of the county recorder of Kern County. This instru-' ment was set out in the indictment. It purported to be an agreement between Eugene Whitte and his wife, Elizebeth Whitte, for the transfer by them of certain lands in Kern County to Charles A. Quinn and his wife, Musetta Culbert son Quinn, and purported to have been signed by Elizabeth Whitt and Eugene Whitt, as well as by the Quinns.
The second count of said indictment charged the defendant with offering and procuring a certain false and forged instrument to be filed and recorded in the office of the county recorder of Kern County, which instrument is set out in said indictment and purported to be a deed from Charles A. Quinn and wife to Mabel Webber, the grantee.
The third count of said indictment charged that the defendant offered and procured a certain false and forged instrument to be registered and recorded in the office of the county recorder…