Morrow

Morrow v. Wells

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 36·30 Cal. App. 306·158 P. 226
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 1916Civ. No. 1708.California865 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $1,080, claimed to have been wrongfully withheld by defendant. Plaintiffs recovered judgment for the sum of $859.69, and this appeal is from such judgment.

The controversy arose out of the sale of certain lands situated in the county of Fresno, the facts being substantially as follows: On the fourth day of March, 1912, the defendant, George E. Wells, entered into a written contract to sell to plaintiffs the land in question. At that time one C. B. Darneal, a son-in-law of the vendor Wells, was in possession of the premises under a certain lease, by the terms of which Dameal had agreed to properly farm, cultivate, care for, and market the crop of fruit growing thereon for the year 1912, and was to receive for his services one-half of the proceeds thereof, and the land was sold subject to such lease. Darneal harvested the fruit and some hay, sold the same, and accounted to Wells, but withheld from the plaintiffs their share, alleged to be the sum sued for. By the terms' and conditions of the contract of sale the vendees of the land, plain tiffs herein, agreed to pay the sum. of $6,750 for the land with interest on deferred payments at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.