Pierce

In this action the plaintiff prayed that the organization of a -certain road improvement district be adjudged void and the defendants enjoined from further proceedings in connection therewith. Defendants were given judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.

The proceedings sought to be annulled were had under the “Road District Improvement Act of 1907.” On the third day of January, 1922, the hoard of supervisors adopted a resolution of intention to order certain road work to be done, containing the following provisions material to this discussion: “Resolved, that it is the intention of the hoard of supervisors, . . . proceeding under and by virtue of the Road District Improvement Act approved March 21st, 1907, and acts amendatory thereof . 4 . to order work to he done as follows: . . . Notice is hereby given that at the time specified hereinbefore for ordering the work ... all objections which are, under the provisions of said Road District Improvement Act of 1907, and acts amendatory thereof, entitled to be heard or determined, will then be heard and determined.” The later resolution ordering the work to he done provides: “All of the herein proposed work shall be done in pursuance of…