Beverly

Beverly v. Fairmont Hotel

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 480·85 Cal. App. 567·259 P. 955
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 1927Docket No. 5864.California1,179 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Petitioner brought this proceeding in certiorari to have annulled an award made by the Industrial Accident Commission denying his application for compensation upon the ground that the same was barred by the provisions of section 11 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 841).

The record discloses the following facts: Petitioner on February 8, 1921, while employed as a stationary engineer at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco, sustained an injury to his back by falling from a tank. The State Compensation Insurance Fund was at that time the insurance carrier for said hotel and it immediately assumed liability, furnished petitioner with medical treatment and paid him compensation until he was discharged from further medical treatment on April 30, 1921. Petitioner continued in the employ of said hotel, but for some time previous to October 28, 1925, complained of the condition of his back. On that date the paymaster of said hotel, named Bishop, sent him to Dr. S. N. Jacobs for medical treatment. The latter had no connection with the State Compensation Insurance Fund, which had ceased to be the insurance carrier for said hotel, but was in the employ of the company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.