Coyne

Johnson v. Coyne

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 557·99 Cal. App. 153·277 P. 1093
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1929Docket No. 3780.California1,946 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

— The plaintiff, as assignee of Nelson Brothers, brought this action to recover an amount alleged to be due for labor performed and materials furnished in the painting and decorating of the interior of a dwelling-house and to foreclose a lien for the value of such labor and materials. The court found against the existence of the alleged lien, but entered judgment against the defendants Coyne and Weisman for the amount demanded in the complaint. The defendant Coyne has appealed from the judgment.

The appellant contends that, at most, the evidence merely shows that he made an oral promise “to answer for the debt or default” of Weisman, and that such promise is invalid because not in writing. It is conceded, of course, that the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent, and all contradictory evidence is omitted.

Prior to May 8, 1923, Coyne and his wife were the owners of the property involved in this suit. On that day they conveyed it to S. R. and Elizabeth S. Ow, who in turn gave Coyne and his wife a mortgage on the property to secure a promissory note for $15,000, and on July 5, 1923, Ow and his wife executed a trust deed to secure another promissory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.